How can you argue with this kind of low level thought process? The reality is; you simply don't. Just walk away, the conversation has gone stupid at that point.....it's just not worth having.
Courtesy of the LA Times.... (shocker)
Do gun absolutists want the right to bear rocket launchers?
But, paranoid rants aside, the logical conclusion of the hyper conservatives' argument ends in a strange place. If the patriots of 1776 could match the redcoats with muskets and cannon, doesn’t the absolutist interpretation of the 2nd Amendment suggest that today’s "patriots" should be able to stand against a modern army? Doesn't it mean that citizens have a right to keep and bear, not just AR-15s, but rocket launchers, tanks, fighter jets and attack helicopters?
No comments:
Post a Comment